The Experience Gap: Why Real Estate Plans With Good Numbers Still Do Not Get Funded

Imagine you have done everything you were told to do.

You have a good property and a clear plan for it.

Your model clears the 7% yield on cost I wrote about two weeks ago: the yearly net operating income, the income left after operating expenses and before the loan payment, divided by everything it cost to buy or build.

You can answer any question about the numbers, because you built them yourself.

Investors take the meeting. Then they pass.

When you get a reason at all, it is polite and vague: the timing, the market, not the right fit right now.

That situation is hypothetical. The problem is not.

In the last two months, a dozen owners and developers have brought me some version of it: a plan that works on paper and equity that will not come in, sometimes the first check, sometimes the last.

The reflex is to rework the model. Sometimes it needs the work. But the numbers are only part of what the investor is weighing.

Here is how I put it last week:

"Learning the numbers can close a knowledge gap. It doesn't close the experience gap, and that is what lenders and investors underwrite."

What an investor is really checking

Clearing 7% is where an investor's review starts, not where it ends. Here is what they check next.

Every number in your plan is a promise about how the property will run: what guests or tenants will pay, how fast it fills, what it costs to operate, what the work costs, and what a buyer pays at the end. Once the return clears the bar, the next question is who has kept promises like these before.

That is why two plans with the same numbers get different answers. One names a team that has run this kind of property through good years and bad. The other has an owner with a good spreadsheet and no record in this kind of property.

Experience also changes how your assumptions are read. On a first plan, it is tempting to pick the best number you can defend for each one: rent at the top of the comparable properties, fast leasing, a lean operating budget, last spring's construction bid, a sale price as strong as today's.

Taken one at a time, each can sound reasonable. Stacked together, they describe a plan where nothing goes wrong, run by someone who has not yet lived through what goes wrong. An experienced investor makes them all less favorable at once and checks whether the plan still works.

3 ways to close the experience gap

You cannot build a track record in a quarter. You can bring one into the plan. Here are 3 ways, and each one costs you something.

1. Hire it. Bring on a general manager, a development lead, or an asset manager who has run this kind of property, and put their record in the plan. It adds payroll you may have to fund before the deal closes, and strong people are hard to recruit to a deal that is not funded yet.
2. Partner for it. Bring in a partner who has done it and give them a stake. It costs equity, and it costs control. I tell owners that partnership means risk that matches control: a partner who takes real risk will want a real say, so give up only the control you are willing to share.
3. Bring it in for a defined role. Engage an experienced operator as your owner's representative (the person who runs the project on your behalf), development advisor, or third-party manager, with a written scope and a fee. Show the investor what that person will do, which decisions they will make, and how long they will stay involved. It costs a fee. You keep ownership and decide how far their authority goes.

Readers ask me which of these I do. In the third option, I am your owner's representative or development advisor: I build the operating plan with you and help you carry it out.

When the risk and the control line up, I am the partner in the second.

What to do before your next investor meeting

1. Name who runs it. Next to operations, development, and asset management, write a name, what that person has run before in this kind of property, and what they will be responsible for in your plan. A blank line is your gap.
2. Put evidence next to every assumption. Rents from signed leases or rates guests actually paid, not asking rents. Costs from current bids or operating history. If an assumption sits at the best end of your evidence, test it at the middle and see whether the yield on cost still clears 7%. If it does not, fix the income or the cost first. A stronger team will not raise the yield.
3. Choose how you close the gap. Hire, partner, or a defined role. Write down what each one costs you in cash, equity, and control.
4. Show the downside you already planned for. Tell the investor what happens if rents come in 10% lower or the work runs 3 months late, and what you will do about it.
5. Fix it before the next meeting, not after the next pass. A second look is harder to get than a first one.

Your numbers start the conversation. The experience behind them is what investors weigh before they write the check.

-Damon

Damon C. Healey, Founder, Eternal Companies

If you own real estate and need someone to package your deals, review your investor and lender terms, or help you decide whether to grow, bring in a partner, or sell, reply to this email and tell me what is stuck. I read every reply.

P.S. You are reading the private edition. Between letters, when a market move changes the math on your properties, I will send you my read here, drawn from my own assets and the owners and operators I work with every day, along with what we are learning at Eternal Companies.

​
​

​